
BYU vs NC State prediction and matchup analysis
BYU vs NC State is a Round of 64 game in the West Region of the 2026 NCAA Tournament. The current projected score is BYU 80, NC State 75. Compare seed, NET rank, KenPom efficiency, injuries, player leaders, and notable wins to evaluate both teams.
Predictions
Review the projected final score, expected total, risk factors, and historical context for this NCAA Tournament matchup.
Explanation
- BYU owns the stronger full profile: better seed, better NET (23 vs. 36), better KenPom overall (23 vs. 34), and stronger resume metrics across the board.
- The Cougars still project as the better offensive team even without Richie Saunders. BYU averages 83.9 points per game and ranks No. 10 nationally in KenPom offense.
- NC State's offense is real and keeps this close. The Wolfpack average 83.7 PPG in the season profile, shoot 38.8% from three, and spread scoring across multiple 13+ PPG threats instead of leaning on one player.
- BYU gets the cleaner defensive edge in the underlying profile. KenPom has the Cougars at No. 57 defensively versus NC State at No. 86, which matters in a game where both teams can score.
- The setup favors BYU. If NC State gets here, it would be coming off a First Four elimination game and a fast turnaround into the Round of 64 site, while BYU gets the extra rest and prep.
Risk factors
- Saunders being out for season removes one of BYU's best scorers and shooters, so the Cougars' offensive floor is lower than its season-long averages suggest.
- NC State can flip the game if its guards win the three-point math. Paul McNeil Jr., Quadir Copeland, and Tre Holloman give the Wolfpack enough shot-making to erase the profile gap.
- If NC State carries momentum from Dayton instead of showing fatigue, BYU's prep edge shrinks quickly.
Historical context
- NCAA seed-history numbers show No. 11 seeds have beaten No. 6 seeds 62 times since 1985, making 6/11 one of the most upset-prone first-round pairings.
- NCAA's First Four history notes that at least one First Four team reached the Round of 32 in all but two of the first 14 tournaments, so NC State would not be arriving as a normal 11-seed underdog with no path.
- NCAA's 11-vs-6 upset history specifically includes NC State's 2024 run as an 11-seed, which is a good reminder that this seed line produces live underdogs, not fake drama.
Explanation
- The scoring baseline is high. BYU averages 83.9 points per game, NC State averages 83.7, and both defenses allow scoring in the mid-70s.
- Both teams bring top-20-ish offensive signals. BYU is No. 10 in KenPom offense, NC State is No. 20, and neither side needs extreme pace to reach the mid-to-upper 70s.
- NC State's 38.8% team three-point shooting raises the ceiling, but BYU's stronger defensive profile and the neutral-site tournament setting keep me short of a full shootout projection.
- BYU has been more comfortable on neutral floors than its plain road split suggests. BYU tournament showed a 7-1 neutral-court record entering the Big 12 tournament, which supports the idea that its offense should travel.
- I land at 155 because it balances both teams' season scoring with a modest March pace discount and a likely second-game-in-three-days tax if NC State arrives from Dayton.
Risk factors
- If NC State arrives hot from the First Four and both backcourts are making jumpers, this can move into the 160s quickly.
- If BYU's post-Saunders offense bogs down into longer half-court possessions, the game can slide into the high 140s instead.
- A one- or two-possession game creates late-foul volatility, so the final total is more fragile than the side.
Historical context
- Recent NCAA examples on this seed line have not required extreme tempo to produce drama: NC State's 80-67 win over Texas Tech in 2024 totaled 147 points, while Duquesne's 71-67 win over BYU in 2024 totaled 138.
- Inference from NCAA seed-history and First Four results: 6/11 games tend to stay competitive late, which keeps late free throws relevant even when the pace is only moderate.
- Inference from the First Four schedule pattern: momentum can help the underdog offense, but the compressed rest window can also flatten perimeter efficiency in the next game, which is why a mid-150s projection is safer than blindly using both teams' raw averages.
Team Comparison
Compare seeds, NET rankings, KenPom profiles, records, and team production side by side.
Record Statistics
| Statistic | BYU | NC State |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 23-11 | 20-13 |
| Conference | Big 12 | ACC |
| Road | 5-5 | 5-6 |
| Neutral | 3-2 | 2-2 |
| Home | 15-4 | 13-5 |
| Quad 1 | 7-10 | 5-8 |
| Quad 2 | 8-1 | 6-4 |
Team Statistics
| Statistic | BYU | NC State |
|---|---|---|
| Team PPG | 83.9 | 83.7 |
| Team RPG | 38.3 | 34.5 |
| Team APG | 13.5 | 15.6 |
| Team SPG | 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Team BPG | 4.4 | 3.4 |
| FG% | 47.7% | 46.8% |
| 3P% | 34.9% | 38.8% |
| FT% | 74.6% | 76.8% |
Rankings
| Statistic | BYU | NC State |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | #6 | #11 |
| NET Rank | #23 | #36 |
| KenPom Rank | #23 | #34 |
| KenPom Adj Off Rank | #10 | #20 |
| KenPom Adj Def Rank | #57 | #86 |
Notable matchups
Use quadrant results and marquee games to compare how each team performed against NCAA Tournament caliber competition.

BYU
Quad 1
- W71-6611/03/2025
- L84-8611/15/2025
- W98-7011/21/2025
- W72-6211/27/2025
- W67-6412/09/2025
- L71-8401/17/2026
- L83-8601/26/2026
- L82-9001/31/2026
- L
Oklahoma St.92-9902/04/2026 - L66-7702/07/2026
- W
Baylor99-9402/10/2026 - L68-7502/18/2026
- W79-6902/21/2026
- L
West Virginia71-7902/28/2026 - L
Cincinnati68-9003/03/2026 - W82-7603/07/2026
- L66-7303/12/2026
Quad 2
- W
Dayton83-7911/28/2025 - W91-6012/03/2025
- W
Kansas St.83-7301/03/2026 - W
Arizona St.104-7601/07/2026 - W
Utah89-8401/10/2026 - W76-7001/14/2026
- L84-9702/24/2026
- W
Kansas St.105-9103/10/2026 - W
West Virginia68-4803/11/2026

NC State
Quad 1
- L97-10211/26/2025
- L
Auburn73-8312/03/2025 - L76-77*12/13/2025
- L61-7601/03/2026
- W
Florida St.113-6901/10/2026 - W80-76*01/20/2026
- W
Wake Forest96-7801/31/2026 - W84-8302/03/2026
- L77-11802/09/2026
- W82-5802/17/2026
- L61-9002/24/2026
- L64-9303/02/2026
- L74-8103/12/2026
Quad 2
- W85-7911/17/2025
- LSeton Hall74-8511/24/2025
- W
Boise St.81-7011/25/2025 - W
Ole Miss76-6212/21/2025 - W
Wake Forest70-5712/31/2025 - W
Pittsburgh81-7201/24/2026 - W
Virginia Tech82-7302/07/2026 - L76-7702/14/2026
- L
Notre Dame90-96*02/28/2026 - L
Stanford84-8503/07/2026
Player Leaders
Review the scorers, rebounders, playmakers, and efficiency leaders most likely to shape this matchup.

BYU
- 1AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%25.3PPG
- 2Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%18.2PPG
- 3Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%18.0PPG
- 4Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%8.5PPG
- 5Dawson BakerG • GP 6 • MIN 19.8FG 45.2% • 3P 47.4% • FT 88.9%7.5PPG
- 1Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%7.3RPG
- 2AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%6.7RPG
- 3Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%5.8RPG
- 4Khadim MboupF • GP 33 • MIN 15.5FG 49.3% • 3P 16.7% • FT 25.0%5.1RPG
- 5Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%3.5RPG
- 1Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%4.7APG
- 2AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%3.8APG
- 3Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%2.1APG
- 4Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%1.3APG
- 5Mihailo BoškovicF • GP 33 • MIN 12.3FG 41.6% • 3P 28.3% • FT 80.0%0.6APG
- 1Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%1.7SPG
- 2Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%1.2SPG
- 3Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%1.1SPG
- 4AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%1.1SPG
- 5Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%1.0SPG
- 1Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%1.7BPG
- 2Abdullah AhmedC • GP 19 • MIN 12.4FG 50.0% • 3P 0.0% • FT 41.7%1.4BPG
- 3Xavion StatonC • GP 9 • MIN 4.9FG 50.0% • 3P 0.0% • FT 50.0%0.6BPG
- 4Khadim MboupF • GP 33 • MIN 15.5FG 49.3% • 3P 16.7% • FT 25.0%0.5BPG
- 5Mihailo BoškovicF • GP 33 • MIN 12.3FG 41.6% • 3P 28.3% • FT 80.0%0.4BPG

NC State
- 1Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%13.9PPG
- 2Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%13.9PPG
- 3Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%13.9PPG
- 4Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%13.8PPG
- 5Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%9.3PPG
- 1Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%7.2RPG
- 2Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%4.6RPG
- 3Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%3.6RPG
- 4Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%3.5RPG
- 5Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%3.5RPG
- 1Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%6.6APG
- 2Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%2.8APG
- 3Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%2.0APG
- 4Alyn BreedG • GP 21 • MIN 14.8FG 40.5% • 3P 34.5% • FT 89.3%1.3APG
- 5Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%1.0APG
- 1Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%1.7SPG
- 2Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%1.2SPG
- 3Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%1.1SPG
- 4Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%0.9SPG
- 5Terrance ArceneauxG • GP 29 • MIN 16.1FG 41.4% • 3P 32.6% • FT 77.3%0.9SPG
- 1Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%0.9BPG
- 2Scottie EbubeC • GP 16 • MIN 4.2FG 88.9% • 3P 0.0% • FT 23.1%0.5BPG
- 3Musa SagniaF • GP 33 • MIN 12.5FG 59.6% • 3P 25.0% • FT 45.5%0.5BPG
- 4Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%0.4BPG
- 5Terrance ArceneauxG • GP 29 • MIN 16.1FG 41.4% • 3P 32.6% • FT 77.3%0.4BPG
Injury Report
Check player availability and injury-related production impact before evaluating the final matchup edge.

BYU
- Xavion StatonCGame Time DecisionPlayer statsGP 9 • MIN 4.9PPG0.6#13RPG0.4#13APG0.3#10SPG0.0#14BPG0.6#3
- Dawson BakerGOut For SeasonPlayer statsGP 6 • MIN 19.8PPG7.5#5RPG1.7#9APG0.5#6SPG0.5#8BPG0.0#12
- Nate PickensGOut For Season
- Richie SaundersFOut For SeasonPlayer statsGP 25 • MIN 31.4PPG18.0#3RPG5.8#3APG2.1#3SPG1.7#1BPG0.3#7

NC State
- Colt LangdonFOutPlayer statsGP 6 • MIN 2.8PPG0.3#13RPG0.2#13APG0.0#13SPG0.0#12BPG0.0#12
- Alyn BreedGGame Time DecisionPlayer statsGP 21 • MIN 14.8PPG4.5#8RPG1.9#9APG1.3#4SPG0.7#6BPG0.0#11