Back to matchup board
Round of 64West Region

BYU vs NC State prediction and matchup analysis

BYU vs NC State is a Round of 64 game in the West Region of the 2026 NCAA Tournament. The current projected score is BYU 80, NC State 75. Compare seed, NET rank, KenPom efficiency, injuries, player leaders, and notable wins to evaluate both teams.

Round of 64West Region

Predictions

Review the projected final score, expected total, risk factors, and historical context for this NCAA Tournament matchup.

BYU 80NC State 75
Final scoreBYU 80, NC State 75

Explanation

  • BYU owns the stronger full profile: better seed, better NET (23 vs. 36), better KenPom overall (23 vs. 34), and stronger resume metrics across the board.
  • The Cougars still project as the better offensive team even without Richie Saunders. BYU averages 83.9 points per game and ranks No. 10 nationally in KenPom offense.
  • NC State's offense is real and keeps this close. The Wolfpack average 83.7 PPG in the season profile, shoot 38.8% from three, and spread scoring across multiple 13+ PPG threats instead of leaning on one player.
  • BYU gets the cleaner defensive edge in the underlying profile. KenPom has the Cougars at No. 57 defensively versus NC State at No. 86, which matters in a game where both teams can score.
  • The setup favors BYU. If NC State gets here, it would be coming off a First Four elimination game and a fast turnaround into the Round of 64 site, while BYU gets the extra rest and prep.

Risk factors

  • Saunders being out for season removes one of BYU's best scorers and shooters, so the Cougars' offensive floor is lower than its season-long averages suggest.
  • NC State can flip the game if its guards win the three-point math. Paul McNeil Jr., Quadir Copeland, and Tre Holloman give the Wolfpack enough shot-making to erase the profile gap.
  • If NC State carries momentum from Dayton instead of showing fatigue, BYU's prep edge shrinks quickly.

Historical context

  • NCAA seed-history numbers show No. 11 seeds have beaten No. 6 seeds 62 times since 1985, making 6/11 one of the most upset-prone first-round pairings.
  • NCAA's First Four history notes that at least one First Four team reached the Round of 32 in all but two of the first 14 tournaments, so NC State would not be arriving as a normal 11-seed underdog with no path.
  • NCAA's 11-vs-6 upset history specifically includes NC State's 2024 run as an 11-seed, which is a good reminder that this seed line produces live underdogs, not fake drama.
Total points155 projected

Explanation

  • The scoring baseline is high. BYU averages 83.9 points per game, NC State averages 83.7, and both defenses allow scoring in the mid-70s.
  • Both teams bring top-20-ish offensive signals. BYU is No. 10 in KenPom offense, NC State is No. 20, and neither side needs extreme pace to reach the mid-to-upper 70s.
  • NC State's 38.8% team three-point shooting raises the ceiling, but BYU's stronger defensive profile and the neutral-site tournament setting keep me short of a full shootout projection.
  • BYU has been more comfortable on neutral floors than its plain road split suggests. BYU tournament showed a 7-1 neutral-court record entering the Big 12 tournament, which supports the idea that its offense should travel.
  • I land at 155 because it balances both teams' season scoring with a modest March pace discount and a likely second-game-in-three-days tax if NC State arrives from Dayton.

Risk factors

  • If NC State arrives hot from the First Four and both backcourts are making jumpers, this can move into the 160s quickly.
  • If BYU's post-Saunders offense bogs down into longer half-court possessions, the game can slide into the high 140s instead.
  • A one- or two-possession game creates late-foul volatility, so the final total is more fragile than the side.

Historical context

  • Recent NCAA examples on this seed line have not required extreme tempo to produce drama: NC State's 80-67 win over Texas Tech in 2024 totaled 147 points, while Duquesne's 71-67 win over BYU in 2024 totaled 138.
  • Inference from NCAA seed-history and First Four results: 6/11 games tend to stay competitive late, which keeps late free throws relevant even when the pace is only moderate.
  • Inference from the First Four schedule pattern: momentum can help the underdog offense, but the compressed rest window can also flatten perimeter efficiency in the next game, which is why a mid-150s projection is safer than blindly using both teams' raw averages.

Team Comparison

Compare seeds, NET rankings, KenPom profiles, records, and team production side by side.

Record Statistics

Statistic
BYU
NC State
Record23-1120-13
ConferenceBig 12ACC
Road5-55-6
Neutral3-22-2
Home15-413-5
Quad 17-105-8
Quad 28-16-4

Team Statistics

Statistic
BYU
NC State
Team PPG83.983.7
Team RPG38.334.5
Team APG13.515.6
Team SPG7.28.1
Team BPG4.43.4
FG%47.7%46.8%
3P%34.9%38.8%
FT%74.6%76.8%

Rankings

Statistic
BYU
NC State
Seed#6#11
NET Rank#23#36
KenPom Rank#23#34
KenPom Adj Off Rank#10#20
KenPom Adj Def Rank#57#86

Notable matchups

Use quadrant results and marquee games to compare how each team performed against NCAA Tournament caliber competition.

BYU

23-11
Notable matchups

Quad 1

7-10
  • W
    Neutral • NET #35
    71-6611/03/2025
  • L
    Neutral • NET #10
    84-8611/15/2025
  • W
    Neutral • NET #25
    98-7011/21/2025
  • W
    Neutral • NET #32
    72-6211/27/2025
  • W
    Neutral • NET #34
    67-6412/09/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #19
    71-8401/17/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #3
    83-8601/26/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #21
    82-9001/31/2026
  • L
    Oklahoma St.Away • NET #74
    92-9902/04/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #5
    66-7702/07/2026
  • W
    BaylorAway • NET #50
    99-9402/10/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #3
    68-7502/18/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #6
    79-6902/21/2026
  • L
    West VirginiaAway • NET #59
    71-7902/28/2026
  • L
    CincinnatiAway • NET #49
    68-9003/03/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #19
    82-7603/07/2026
  • L
    Neutral • NET #5
    66-7303/12/2026
Notable matchups

Quad 2

8-1
  • W
    DaytonNeutral • NET #69
    83-7911/28/2025
  • W
    Neutral • NET #98
    91-6012/03/2025
  • W
    Kansas St.Away • NET #100
    83-7301/03/2026
  • W
    Arizona St.Home • NET #73
    104-7601/07/2026
  • W
    UtahAway • NET #132
    89-8401/10/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #39
    76-7001/14/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #51
    84-9702/24/2026
  • W
    Kansas St.Neutral • NET #100
    105-9103/10/2026
  • W
    West VirginiaNeutral • NET #59
    68-4803/11/2026

NC State

20-13
Notable matchups

Quad 1

5-8
  • L
    Neutral • NET #42
    97-10211/26/2025
  • L
    AuburnAway • NET #38
    73-8312/03/2025
  • L
    Home • NET #21
    76-77*12/13/2025
  • L
    Home • NET #12
    61-7601/03/2026
  • W
    Florida St.Away • NET #62
    113-6901/10/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #34
    80-76*01/20/2026
  • W
    Wake ForestAway • NET #66
    96-7801/31/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #37
    84-8302/03/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #17
    77-11802/09/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #24
    82-5802/17/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #12
    61-9002/24/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #1
    64-9303/02/2026
  • L
    Neutral • NET #12
    74-8103/12/2026
Notable matchups

Quad 2

6-4
  • W
    Home • NET #43
    85-7911/17/2025
  • L
    Seton HallNeutral • NET #53
    74-8511/24/2025
  • W
    Boise St.Neutral • NET #60
    81-7011/25/2025
  • W
    Ole MissNeutral • NET #82
    76-6212/21/2025
  • W
    Wake ForestHome • NET #66
    70-5712/31/2025
  • W
    PittsburghAway • NET #104
    81-7201/24/2026
  • W
    Virginia TechHome • NET #55
    82-7302/07/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #32
    76-7702/14/2026
  • L
    Notre DameAway • NET #94
    90-96*02/28/2026
  • L
    StanfordHome • NET #61
    84-8503/07/2026

Player Leaders

Review the scorers, rebounders, playmakers, and efficiency leaders most likely to shape this matchup.

BYU

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%
    25.3PPG
  • 2
    Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%
    18.2PPG
  • 3
    Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%
    18.0PPG
  • 4
    Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%
    8.5PPG
  • 5
    Dawson BakerG • GP 6 • MIN 19.8FG 45.2% • 3P 47.4% • FT 88.9%
    7.5PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%
    7.3RPG
  • 2
    AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%
    6.7RPG
  • 3
    Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%
    5.8RPG
  • 4
    Khadim MboupF • GP 33 • MIN 15.5FG 49.3% • 3P 16.7% • FT 25.0%
    5.1RPG
  • 5
    Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%
    3.5RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%
    4.7APG
  • 2
    AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%
    3.8APG
  • 3
    Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%
    2.1APG
  • 4
    Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%
    1.3APG
  • 5
    Mihailo BoškovicF • GP 33 • MIN 12.3FG 41.6% • 3P 28.3% • FT 80.0%
    0.6APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Richie SaundersG • GP 25 • MIN 31.4FG 48.9% • 3P 37.6% • FT 81.7%
    1.7SPG
  • 2
    Robert Wright IIIG • GP 34 • MIN 34.8FG 46.9% • 3P 42.2% • FT 82.6%
    1.2SPG
  • 3
    Kennard Davis Jr.F • GP 31 • MIN 29.3FG 39.1% • 3P 32.1% • FT 75.7%
    1.1SPG
  • 4
    AJ DybantsaF • GP 34 • MIN 34.6FG 51.3% • 3P 34.0% • FT 76.4%
    1.1SPG
  • 5
    Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%
    1.0SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    Keba KeitaF • GP 32 • MIN 22.6FG 67.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 52.7%
    1.7BPG
  • 2
    Abdullah AhmedC • GP 19 • MIN 12.4FG 50.0% • 3P 0.0% • FT 41.7%
    1.4BPG
  • 3
    Xavion StatonC • GP 9 • MIN 4.9FG 50.0% • 3P 0.0% • FT 50.0%
    0.6BPG
  • 4
    Khadim MboupF • GP 33 • MIN 15.5FG 49.3% • 3P 16.7% • FT 25.0%
    0.5BPG
  • 5
    Mihailo BoškovicF • GP 33 • MIN 12.3FG 41.6% • 3P 28.3% • FT 80.0%
    0.4BPG

NC State

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%
    13.9PPG
  • 2
    Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%
    13.9PPG
  • 3
    Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%
    13.9PPG
  • 4
    Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%
    13.8PPG
  • 5
    Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%
    9.3PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%
    7.2RPG
  • 2
    Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%
    4.6RPG
  • 3
    Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%
    3.6RPG
  • 4
    Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%
    3.5RPG
  • 5
    Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%
    3.5RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%
    6.6APG
  • 2
    Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%
    2.8APG
  • 3
    Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%
    2.0APG
  • 4
    Alyn BreedG • GP 21 • MIN 14.8FG 40.5% • 3P 34.5% • FT 89.3%
    1.3APG
  • 5
    Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%
    1.0APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Quadir CopelandG • GP 33 • MIN 28.6FG 49.7% • 3P 39.7% • FT 77.7%
    1.7SPG
  • 2
    Matt AbleG • GP 33 • MIN 21.6FG 41.7% • 3P 35.5% • FT 82.0%
    1.2SPG
  • 3
    Darrion WilliamsF • GP 32 • MIN 29.8FG 41.3% • 3P 40.1% • FT 76.6%
    1.1SPG
  • 4
    Tre HollomanG • GP 31 • MIN 25.6FG 42.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 81.2%
    0.9SPG
  • 5
    Terrance ArceneauxG • GP 29 • MIN 16.1FG 41.4% • 3P 32.6% • FT 77.3%
    0.9SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    Ven-Allen LubinF • GP 33 • MIN 28.3FG 67.6% • 3P 27.3% • FT 73.9%
    0.9BPG
  • 2
    Scottie EbubeC • GP 16 • MIN 4.2FG 88.9% • 3P 0.0% • FT 23.1%
    0.5BPG
  • 3
    Musa SagniaF • GP 33 • MIN 12.5FG 59.6% • 3P 25.0% • FT 45.5%
    0.5BPG
  • 4
    Paul McNeil Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 28.5FG 43.5% • 3P 42.9% • FT 82.4%
    0.4BPG
  • 5
    Terrance ArceneauxG • GP 29 • MIN 16.1FG 41.4% • 3P 32.6% • FT 77.3%
    0.4BPG

Injury Report

Check player availability and injury-related production impact before evaluating the final matchup edge.

BYU

4 listed
  • Xavion StatonC
    Game Time Decision
    InjuryUndisclosed
    Player statsGP 9 • MIN 4.9
    PPG0.6#13
    RPG0.4#13
    APG0.3#10
    SPG0.0#14
    BPG0.6#3
  • Dawson BakerG
    Out For Season
    InjuryKnee
    Player statsGP 6 • MIN 19.8
    PPG7.5#5
    RPG1.7#9
    APG0.5#6
    SPG0.5#8
    BPG0.0#12
  • Nate PickensG
    Out For Season
    InjuryUndisclosed
  • Richie SaundersF
    Out For Season
    InjuryKnee
    Player statsGP 25 • MIN 31.4
    PPG18.0#3
    RPG5.8#3
    APG2.1#3
    SPG1.7#1
    BPG0.3#7

NC State

2 listed
  • Colt LangdonF
    Out
    InjuryUndisclosed
    Player statsGP 6 • MIN 2.8
    PPG0.3#13
    RPG0.2#13
    APG0.0#13
    SPG0.0#12
    BPG0.0#12
  • Alyn BreedG
    Game Time Decision
    InjuryUndisclosed
    Player statsGP 21 • MIN 14.8
    PPG4.5#8
    RPG1.9#9
    APG1.3#4
    SPG0.7#6
    BPG0.0#11