Back to matchup board
Round of 64South Region

Florida vs Prairie View A&M prediction and matchup analysis

Florida vs Prairie View A&M is a Round of 64 game in the South Region of the 2026 NCAA Tournament. The current projected score is Florida 94, Prairie View A&M 62. Compare seed, NET rank, KenPom efficiency, injuries, player leaders, and notable wins to evaluate both teams.

Round of 64South Region

Predictions

Review the projected final score, expected total, risk factors, and historical context for this NCAA Tournament matchup.

Florida 94Prairie View A&M 62
Final scoreFlorida 94, Prairie View A&M 62

Explanation

  • Florida has the clear resume and efficiency edge in the season profile snapshot: 26-7, NET 4, KenPom 4, 12-6 in Quad 1, 6-1 in Quad 2, and 4-0 on neutral floors, compared with Prairie View A&M at 18-17, NET 300, KenPom 288, 0-3 in Quad 1, and 0-2 in Quad 2.
  • The player profile points to a major physical advantage for Florida. The Gators average 86.8 points and 45.4 rebounds per game, while Prairie View A&M sits at 78.9 points and 34.0 rebounds.
  • Prairie View A&M's step-up games were rough defensively. The Panthers gave up 94, 91, 111, 105, and 104 points in their five Quad 1 and Quad 2 losses, which is the clearest signal for why Florida projects into the 90s.
  • The schedule-strength gap is massive. resume metrics lists Florida with the nation's No. 1 strength of schedule and Prairie View A&M at No. 359, so Prairie View's raw scoring profile does not translate cleanly against a top-six KenPom defense.
  • Florida's frontcourt depth and two-way balance make it hard to find Prairie View A&M's path to four efficient offensive quarters. Thomas Haugh, Alex Condon, Rueben Chinyelu, and Xaivian Lee give Florida multiple creators and rebounders.

Risk factors

  • Florida is not an elite three-point shooting team in the season and web snapshots, so a cold perimeter game could pull the final margin down and keep the score in the high 80s.
  • Prairie View A&M's guard trio of Dontae Horne, Tai'Reon Joseph, and Cory Wells gives the Panthers enough shot creation to beat this offensive projection if they force turnovers and score in transition.
  • Blowouts are noisy late. Florida's bench could push the margin even higher, but an early-decided game can also lose pace once the starters sit.

Historical context

  • NCAA notes that No. 1 seeds were 154-2 all-time against No. 16 seeds entering the 2025 tournament, with only UMBC in 2018 and Fairleigh Dickinson in 2023 breaking through.
  • Prairie View A&M's most recent NCAA tournament appearance was the 2019 First Four, where it lost 82-76 to Fairleigh Dickinson. NCAA also notes the Panthers were on the wrong end of the tournament's biggest 1-vs-16 blowout, 110-52 against Kansas in 1998.
  • Florida's form profile supports a comfortable favorite outcome. resume metrics had the Gators at 8-1 in their last 10 entering the bracket, and Florida's March 2026 showed a 12-game winning streak and 89.7 points per game over the previous 10 before the SEC title-game loss.
Total points156 projected

Explanation

  • Pace should be healthy. KenPom file lists Florida 28th and Prairie View A&M 23rd in adjusted tempo, so this matchup does not start from a slow-possession baseline.
  • A simple efficiency blend points even higher than this number. Combining Florida's elite adjusted offense with Prairie View A&M's below-average adjusted defense produces a raw projection in the upper 150s to low 160s, and I only trim it slightly for late-game slowdown risk.
  • Prairie View A&M's Q1/Q2 sample was high scoring even in losses. Those five games averaged 175.8 total points, mostly because stronger opponents were able to score efficiently without completely shutting down Prairie View's guards.
  • Florida's offense has recently played at a high ceiling against much better competition than Prairie View A&M has seen. The Gators' March showed 107 and 112 points in the two games before Selection Sunday and 89.7 points per game over the prior 10-game stretch.
  • I land at 156 instead of the low 160s because big favorite games often lose late possessions once the favorite builds separation and starts protecting minutes.

Risk factors

  • If Prairie View A&M advances out of the First Four and arrives on short rest, fatigue could weaken the Panthers' defense enough for Florida to threaten the high 90s by itself.
  • If Florida's size edge turns the game into a half-court rebound-and-rim-protection script, Prairie View A&M could be held in the high 50s, which would drag the total into the low 150s.
  • Free throws are the main upward swing factor. Prairie View A&M shoots better than Florida from the line in both the season profile and resume metrics, so late foul sequences could keep the total climbing even in a lopsided game.

Historical context

  • One-vs-16 games often reach the mid-140s or better because the favorite can carry most of the scoring load on its own, but they also flatten late when benches empty and the outcome is no longer in doubt.
  • Prairie View A&M's 2019 First Four loss to Fairleigh Dickinson finished with 158 total points, which is a useful program-level reference point for how the Panthers' guard-driven style can still support a healthy game total.
  • Florida's recent results against SEC competition regularly produced totals in the 150s and above, so a projection in that range is consistent with both the Gators' offense and the matchup's expected pace.

Team Comparison

Compare seeds, NET rankings, KenPom profiles, records, and team production side by side.

Record Statistics

Statistic
Florida
Prairie View A&M
Record26-718-17
ConferenceSECSWAC
Road6-55-9
Neutral4-01-2
Home16-212-6
Quad 112-60-3
Quad 26-10-2

Team Statistics

Statistic
Florida
Prairie View A&M
Team PPG86.878.9
Team RPG45.434.0
Team APG16.611.9
Team SPG6.77.9
Team BPG5.14.7
FG%47.8%44.3%
3P%30.8%33.4%
FT%71.0%75.3%

Rankings

Statistic
Florida
Prairie View A&M
Seed#1#16
NET Rank#4#300
KenPom Rank#4#288
KenPom Adj Off Rank#9#310
KenPom Adj Def Rank#6#232

Notable matchups

Use quadrant results and marquee games to compare how each team performed against NCAA Tournament caliber competition.

Florida

26-7
Notable matchups

Quad 1

12-6
  • L
    Neutral • NET #3
    87-9311/03/2025
  • W
    Neutral • NET #32
    82-6811/16/2025
  • L
    Neutral • NET #39
    80-8411/27/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #1
    66-6712/02/2025
  • L
    Neutral • NET #10
    73-7712/09/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #58
    74-7601/03/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #20
    91-6701/10/2026
  • W
    OklahomaAway • NET #48
    96-7901/13/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #13
    98-9401/17/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #18
    100-7702/01/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #44
    86-6702/07/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #33
    86-6602/11/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #28
    92-8302/14/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #42
    84-7102/25/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #15
    111-7702/28/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #28
    84-7703/07/2026
  • W
    Neutral • NET #28
    71-6303/13/2026
  • L
    Neutral • NET #13
    74-9103/14/2026
Notable matchups

Quad 2

6-1
  • W
    Florida St.Home • NET #62
    78-7611/11/2025
  • W
    ProvidenceNeutral • NET #80
    90-7811/28/2025
  • W
    George WashingtonNeutral • NET #91
    80-7012/13/2025
  • W
    Home • NET #33
    92-7701/06/2026
  • L
    AuburnHome • NET #38
    67-7601/24/2026
  • W
    South CarolinaAway • NET #108
    95-4801/28/2026
  • W
    Ole MissAway • NET #82
    94-7502/21/2026

Prairie View A&M

18-17
Notable matchups

Quad 1

0-3
  • L
    Oklahoma St.Away • NET #74
    67-9411/12/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #58
    73-9111/17/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #44
    82-11112/29/2025
Notable matchups

Quad 2

0-2
  • L
    Wichita St.Away • NET #78
    62-10511/08/2025
  • L
    LSUAway • NET #77
    90-10412/22/2025

Player Leaders

Review the scorers, rebounders, playmakers, and efficiency leaders most likely to shape this matchup.

Florida

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    Thomas HaughF • GP 32 • MIN 33.5FG 46.1% • 3P 33.1% • FT 76.6%
    17.1PPG
  • 2
    Alex CondonF • GP 32 • MIN 30.6FG 54.8% • 3P 17.0% • FT 64.8%
    15.0PPG
  • 3
    Boogie FlandG • GP 33 • MIN 30.0FG 43.5% • 3P 23.3% • FT 72.5%
    11.6PPG
  • 4
    Xaivian LeeG • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 41.4% • 3P 28.2% • FT 77.1%
    11.5PPG
  • 5
    Rueben ChinyeluC • GP 33 • MIN 24.8FG 58.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 69.0%
    11.2PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Rueben ChinyeluC • GP 33 • MIN 24.8FG 58.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 69.0%
    11.5RPG
  • 2
    Alex CondonF • GP 32 • MIN 30.6FG 54.8% • 3P 17.0% • FT 64.8%
    7.7RPG
  • 3
    Thomas HaughF • GP 32 • MIN 33.5FG 46.1% • 3P 33.1% • FT 76.6%
    6.2RPG
  • 4
    Micah HandlogtenC • GP 32 • MIN 14.8FG 63.8% • 3P 0.0% • FT 37.0%
    5.9RPG
  • 5
    Xaivian LeeG • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 41.4% • 3P 28.2% • FT 77.1%
    3.8RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Xaivian LeeG • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 41.4% • 3P 28.2% • FT 77.1%
    4.2APG
  • 2
    Alex CondonF • GP 32 • MIN 30.6FG 54.8% • 3P 17.0% • FT 64.8%
    3.5APG
  • 3
    Boogie FlandG • GP 33 • MIN 30.0FG 43.5% • 3P 23.3% • FT 72.5%
    3.4APG
  • 4
    Thomas HaughF • GP 32 • MIN 33.5FG 46.1% • 3P 33.1% • FT 76.6%
    2.0APG
  • 5
    Urban KlavzarG • GP 33 • MIN 20.9FG 43.8% • 3P 40.2% • FT 91.4%
    1.2APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Boogie FlandG • GP 33 • MIN 30.0FG 43.5% • 3P 23.3% • FT 72.5%
    1.8SPG
  • 2
    Xaivian LeeG • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 41.4% • 3P 28.2% • FT 77.1%
    1.2SPG
  • 3
    Thomas HaughF • GP 32 • MIN 33.5FG 46.1% • 3P 33.1% • FT 76.6%
    1.1SPG
  • 4
    Rueben ChinyeluC • GP 33 • MIN 24.8FG 58.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 69.0%
    0.8SPG
  • 5
    Alex CondonF • GP 32 • MIN 30.6FG 54.8% • 3P 17.0% • FT 64.8%
    0.7SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    Alex CondonF • GP 32 • MIN 30.6FG 54.8% • 3P 17.0% • FT 64.8%
    1.4BPG
  • 2
    Rueben ChinyeluC • GP 33 • MIN 24.8FG 58.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 69.0%
    1.1BPG
  • 3
    Thomas HaughF • GP 32 • MIN 33.5FG 46.1% • 3P 33.1% • FT 76.6%
    1.0BPG
  • 4
    Micah HandlogtenC • GP 32 • MIN 14.8FG 63.8% • 3P 0.0% • FT 37.0%
    0.9BPG
  • 5
    Isaiah BrownG • GP 31 • MIN 12.6FG 45.9% • 3P 33.3% • FT 74.4%
    0.3BPG

Prairie View A&M

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    Dontae HorneG • GP 35 • MIN 31.8FG 44.8% • 3P 31.7% • FT 79.8%
    20.2PPG
  • 2
    Tai'Reon JosephG • GP 27 • MIN 30.6FG 41.1% • 3P 30.7% • FT 76.3%
    18.2PPG
  • 3
    Cory WellsF • GP 35 • MIN 33.0FG 39.3% • 3P 37.0% • FT 73.5%
    13.1PPG
  • 4
    Lance WilliamsG • GP 35 • MIN 35.3FG 44.8% • 3P 43.1% • FT 79.6%
    10.1PPG
  • 5
    Doug YoungG • GP 3 • MIN 26.3FG 44.4% • 3P 36.4% • FT 0.0%
    9.3PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Cory WellsF • GP 35 • MIN 33.0FG 39.3% • 3P 37.0% • FT 73.5%
    7.1RPG
  • 2
    Dontae HorneG • GP 35 • MIN 31.8FG 44.8% • 3P 31.7% • FT 79.8%
    4.5RPG
  • 3
    Joey MadimbaG • GP 25 • MIN 18.4FG 46.7% • 3P 24.5% • FT 72.1%
    3.6RPG
  • 4
    Corey DunningF • GP 32 • MIN 17.8FG 58.1% • 3P 0.0% • FT 25.0%
    3.4RPG
  • 5
    Lance WilliamsG • GP 35 • MIN 35.3FG 44.8% • 3P 43.1% • FT 79.6%
    3.2RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Lance WilliamsG • GP 35 • MIN 35.3FG 44.8% • 3P 43.1% • FT 79.6%
    3.3APG
  • 2
    Dontae HorneG • GP 35 • MIN 31.8FG 44.8% • 3P 31.7% • FT 79.8%
    3.1APG
  • 3
    Cory WellsF • GP 35 • MIN 33.0FG 39.3% • 3P 37.0% • FT 73.5%
    2.2APG
  • 4
    Doug YoungG • GP 3 • MIN 26.3FG 44.4% • 3P 36.4% • FT 0.0%
    1.7APG
  • 5
    Tai'Reon JosephG • GP 27 • MIN 30.6FG 41.1% • 3P 30.7% • FT 76.3%
    1.0APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Dontae HorneG • GP 35 • MIN 31.8FG 44.8% • 3P 31.7% • FT 79.8%
    1.9SPG
  • 2
    Doug YoungG • GP 3 • MIN 26.3FG 44.4% • 3P 36.4% • FT 0.0%
    1.3SPG
  • 3
    Cory WellsF • GP 35 • MIN 33.0FG 39.3% • 3P 37.0% • FT 73.5%
    1.2SPG
  • 4
    Tai'Reon JosephG • GP 27 • MIN 30.6FG 41.1% • 3P 30.7% • FT 76.3%
    1.1SPG
  • 5
    Lance WilliamsG • GP 35 • MIN 35.3FG 44.8% • 3P 43.1% • FT 79.6%
    1.1SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    Corey DunningF • GP 32 • MIN 17.8FG 58.1% • 3P 0.0% • FT 25.0%
    1.2BPG
  • 2
    Cory WellsF • GP 35 • MIN 33.0FG 39.3% • 3P 37.0% • FT 73.5%
    1.1BPG
  • 3
    Joey MadimbaG • GP 25 • MIN 18.4FG 46.7% • 3P 24.5% • FT 72.1%
    0.7BPG
  • 4
    Keeshawn MasonF • GP 27 • MIN 16.2FG 46.2% • 3P 33.3% • FT 65.9%
    0.6BPG
  • 5
    Hassane DialloF • GP 26 • MIN 9.4FG 57.1% • 3P 0.0% • FT 60.0%
    0.6BPG

Injury Report

Check player availability and injury-related production impact before evaluating the final matchup edge.

Florida

0 listed

No injuries listed for this team.

Prairie View A&M

1 listed
  • Doug YoungG
    Out
    InjuryUndisclosed
    Player statsGP 3 • MIN 26.3
    PPG9.3#5
    RPG2.3#10
    APG1.7#4
    SPG1.3#2
    BPG0.0#15