Back to matchup board
Round of 64East Region

UCLA vs UCF prediction and matchup analysis

UCLA vs UCF is a Round of 64 game in the East Region of the 2026 NCAA Tournament. The current projected score is UCLA 77, UCF 72. Compare seed, NET rank, KenPom efficiency, injuries, player leaders, and notable wins to evaluate both teams.

Round of 64East Region

Predictions

Review the projected final score, expected total, risk factors, and historical context for this NCAA Tournament matchup.

UCLA 77UCF 72
Final scoreUCLA 77, UCF 72

Explanation

  • UCLA owns the cleaner full-profile edge in the season profile snapshot: better seed (7 vs. 10), better NET (30 vs. 51), better KenPom overall (27 vs. 54), better offense rank (22 vs. 40), and a much better defense rank (53 vs. 101).
  • The Bruins are the more efficient shooting team possession to possession. the season profile player/team profile gives UCLA edges in field-goal percentage (47.1% vs. 46.6%), three-point percentage (38.2% vs. 36.2%), free-throw percentage (76.7% vs. 74.0%), and assists (16.3 vs. 15.8).
  • UCLA's lead-guard structure is a real differentiator in a tournament game. Donovan Dent drives 7.6 assists per game in the season profile, and Tyler Bilodeau gives UCLA the best proven half-court scorer on either side at 17.6 points per game.
  • UCLA's recent neutral-floor form is stronger. The Bruins beat Michigan State 88-84 in the Big Ten tournament before playing Purdue within 66-73, while UCF entered the bracket off a 66-65 neutral win over Cincinnati followed by a 59-81 loss to Arizona in Kansas City.
  • I do not project a runaway because UCF has more rebounding volume and a real upset ceiling. The Knights average 37.2 rebounds per game in the season profile, and their resume includes wins over Texas A&M, Kansas, Texas Tech, and BYU.

Risk factors

  • UCLA's injury uncertainty is the biggest reason this stays medium-low confidence. the injury report still lists both Dent and Bilodeau as game-time decisions, and Bilodeau is the Bruins' leading scorer.
  • UCF can absolutely flip the game if Jamichael Stillwell, John Bol, and Jordan Burks turn this into a second-chance-possession game. The Knights have the better raw rebounding profile.
  • UCF already proved it can beat tournament-level teams away from home, including road wins at Texas A&M and BYU. If Riley Kugel and Themus Fulks get hot from deep, the seed gap matters less.

Historical context

  • NCAA bracket history makes this a dangerous seed line. The NCAA's 10-vs-7 history page shows No. 10 seeds have won often enough against No. 7 seeds to make this one of the most upset-prone Round of 64 pairings.
  • UCLA was also a No. 7 seed in 2024 and opened that tournament with a controlled 72-47 win over Utah State before losing 66-58 to Tennessee. That recent path is a reminder that Mick Cronin teams often drag these games toward execution and defense.
  • UCF's most recent NCAA Tournament appearance in 2019 opened with a 73-58 win over VCU. The program does have recent evidence that its physicality and guard play can travel into March.
Total points149 projected

Explanation

  • The raw season scoring averages suggest an upper-150s environment, but UCLA's stronger overall defense and better half-court control pull the projection down from there.
  • UCF's offense is good enough to avoid a true rock fight. The Knights average 81.0 points per game in the season profile and have multiple double-digit scorers, plus a strong offensive-rebounding base that can create put-backs.
  • UCLA should still be the more stable offense in this matchup because UCF's defensive profile is shakier. KenPom puts the Knights at 101st defensively, which is the softest unit in the game.
  • Recent neutral-site results for both teams point more toward a high-140s outcome than a track meet. UCLA's last two Big Ten tournament games totaled 172 and 139, while UCF's last two Big 12 tournament games totaled 131 and 140.
  • My midpoint lands at 149 because it balances UCLA's shot quality edge with UCF's rebounding-driven possession volume and the late-game free throws that usually appear in a competitive NCAA opener.

Risk factors

  • If UCF wins the glass decisively and turns misses into extra possessions, this total can climb into the mid-150s even without elite shooting.
  • If Bilodeau or Dent are limited, UCLA's offense gets less efficient and the game can sink toward the low 140s.
  • If both teams shoot close to their season three-point numbers, the total may finish a little above this estimate; if tournament nerves flatten the perimeter shooting, it likely finishes below it.

Historical context

  • Recent NCAA openers for both programs finished well below their current regular-season scoring averages: UCLA's 2024 first-round win over Utah State totaled 119 points, and UCF's 2019 first-round win over VCU totaled 131.
  • Round of 64 games on the 7-vs-10 seed line are often competitive into the final minute, which creates some late free throws but also tends to slow the game into longer half-court possessions.
  • UCLA's recent March games under Cronin have generally leaned more controlled than its regular-season pace, which supports a total just under 150 rather than a free-flowing 160-plus game.

Team Comparison

Compare seeds, NET rankings, KenPom profiles, records, and team production side by side.

Record Statistics

Statistic
UCLA
UCF
Record23-1121-11
ConferenceBig TenBig 12
Road6-55-5
Neutral3-22-2
Home14-414-4
Quad 15-85-8
Quad 25-36-3

Team Statistics

Statistic
UCLA
UCF
Team PPG77.781.0
Team RPG32.337.2
Team APG16.315.8
Team SPG6.65.7
Team BPG2.93.0
FG%47.1%46.6%
3P%38.2%36.2%
FT%76.7%74.0%

Rankings

Statistic
UCLA
UCF
Seed#7#10
NET Rank#30#51
KenPom Rank#27#54
KenPom Adj Off Rank#22#40
KenPom Adj Def Rank#53#101

Notable matchups

Use quadrant results and marquee games to compare how each team performed against NCAA Tournament caliber competition.

UCLA

23-11
Notable matchups

Quad 1

5-8
  • L
    Neutral • NET #3
    65-6911/14/2025
  • W
    WashingtonAway • NET #57
    82-8012/03/2025
  • L
    Neutral • NET #7
    72-8212/13/2025
  • L
    Away • NET #27
    61-7401/03/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #25
    72-8001/06/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #29
    74-8601/17/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #9
    69-6701/20/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #2
    56-8602/14/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #11
    59-8202/17/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #8
    95-94*02/21/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #14
    72-5203/03/2026
  • W
    Neutral • NET #11
    88-8403/13/2026
  • L
    Neutral • NET #9
    66-7303/14/2026
Notable matchups

Quad 2

5-3
  • L
    CaliforniaNeutral • NET #67
    72-8011/25/2025
  • W
    Arizona St.Home • NET #73
    90-7712/17/2025
  • W
    NorthwesternHome • NET #65
    71-6401/24/2026
  • W
    OregonAway • NET #109
    73-5701/28/2026
  • L
    IndianaHome • NET #41
    97-98*01/31/2026
  • W
    WashingtonHome • NET #57
    77-7302/07/2026
  • L
    MinnesotaAway • NET #81
    73-7802/28/2026
  • W
    Southern CaliforniaAway • NET #79
    89-6803/07/2026

UCF

21-11
Notable matchups

Quad 1

5-8
  • L
    Home • NET #13
    93-10511/08/2025
  • W
    Away • NET #44
    86-7411/14/2025
  • W
    Home • NET #21
    81-7501/03/2026
  • L
    Oklahoma St.Away • NET #74
    76-8701/06/2026
  • L
    Home • NET #3
    77-8401/17/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #6
    57-8701/20/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #19
    88-8001/31/2026
  • L
    Away • NET #5
    55-7902/04/2026
  • L
    CincinnatiAway • NET #49
    72-9202/08/2026
  • W
    Away • NET #23
    97-8402/24/2026
  • L
    West VirginiaAway • NET #59
    62-7703/06/2026
  • W
    CincinnatiNeutral • NET #49
    66-65*03/11/2026
  • L
    Neutral • NET #3
    59-8103/12/2026
Notable matchups

Quad 2

6-3
  • W
    CincinnatiHome • NET #49
    73-7201/11/2026
  • W
    Kansas St.Away • NET #100
    82-7301/14/2026
  • W
    ColoradoAway • NET #76
    95-8601/24/2026
  • W
    Arizona St.Home • NET #73
    79-7601/27/2026
  • L
    West VirginiaHome • NET #59
    67-7402/14/2026
  • W
    Home • NET #39
    82-7102/17/2026
  • W
    UtahAway • NET #132
    73-7102/21/2026
  • L
    BaylorHome • NET #50
    86-8702/28/2026
  • L
    Oklahoma St.Home • NET #74
    104-111*03/03/2026

Player Leaders

Review the scorers, rebounders, playmakers, and efficiency leaders most likely to shape this matchup.

UCLA

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    Tyler BilodeauF • GP 31 • MIN 30.2FG 51.8% • 3P 46.4% • FT 87.3%
    17.6PPG
  • 2
    Donovan DentG • GP 33 • MIN 34.2FG 42.0% • 3P 26.2% • FT 63.6%
    13.5PPG
  • 3
    Trent PerryG • GP 33 • MIN 29.6FG 44.6% • 3P 41.2% • FT 87.4%
    12.7PPG
  • 4
    Skyy ClarkG • GP 24 • MIN 28.7FG 46.0% • 3P 43.2% • FT 86.1%
    11.7PPG
  • 5
    Eric Dailey Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 49.0% • 3P 31.1% • FT 70.5%
    11.3PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Eric Dailey Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 49.0% • 3P 31.1% • FT 70.5%
    5.8RPG
  • 2
    Tyler BilodeauF • GP 31 • MIN 30.2FG 51.8% • 3P 46.4% • FT 87.3%
    5.6RPG
  • 3
    Xavier BookerF • GP 34 • MIN 19.6FG 55.0% • 3P 41.7% • FT 69.7%
    3.3RPG
  • 4
    Trent PerryG • GP 33 • MIN 29.6FG 44.6% • 3P 41.2% • FT 87.4%
    2.9RPG
  • 5
    Donovan DentG • GP 33 • MIN 34.2FG 42.0% • 3P 26.2% • FT 63.6%
    2.9RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Donovan DentG • GP 33 • MIN 34.2FG 42.0% • 3P 26.2% • FT 63.6%
    7.6APG
  • 2
    Trent PerryG • GP 33 • MIN 29.6FG 44.6% • 3P 41.2% • FT 87.4%
    2.9APG
  • 3
    Skyy ClarkG • GP 24 • MIN 28.7FG 46.0% • 3P 43.2% • FT 86.1%
    2.1APG
  • 4
    Eric Dailey Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 49.0% • 3P 31.1% • FT 70.5%
    1.3APG
  • 5
    Tyler BilodeauF • GP 31 • MIN 30.2FG 51.8% • 3P 46.4% • FT 87.3%
    1.1APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Donovan DentG • GP 33 • MIN 34.2FG 42.0% • 3P 26.2% • FT 63.6%
    1.6SPG
  • 2
    Skyy ClarkG • GP 24 • MIN 28.7FG 46.0% • 3P 43.2% • FT 86.1%
    1.2SPG
  • 3
    Trent PerryG • GP 33 • MIN 29.6FG 44.6% • 3P 41.2% • FT 87.4%
    0.9SPG
  • 4
    Eric Dailey Jr.G • GP 33 • MIN 27.5FG 49.0% • 3P 31.1% • FT 70.5%
    0.9SPG
  • 5
    Steven Jamerson IIF • GP 33 • MIN 9.6FG 73.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 63.0%
    0.6SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    Xavier BookerF • GP 34 • MIN 19.6FG 55.0% • 3P 41.7% • FT 69.7%
    1.1BPG
  • 2
    Steven Jamerson IIF • GP 33 • MIN 9.6FG 73.3% • 3P 0.0% • FT 63.0%
    0.4BPG
  • 3
    Tyler BilodeauF • GP 31 • MIN 30.2FG 51.8% • 3P 46.4% • FT 87.3%
    0.4BPG
  • 4
    Donovan DentG • GP 33 • MIN 34.2FG 42.0% • 3P 26.2% • FT 63.6%
    0.3BPG
  • 5
    Brandon WilliamsG • GP 32 • MIN 12.3FG 42.7% • 3P 24.0% • FT 63.0%
    0.2BPG

UCF

Points leadersPPG
  • 1
    Riley KugelG • GP 30 • MIN 28.9FG 41.8% • 3P 39.2% • FT 77.1%
    14.4PPG
  • 2
    Themus FulksG • GP 32 • MIN 32.8FG 46.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 79.5%
    14.1PPG
  • 3
    Jordan BurksF • GP 32 • MIN 28.0FG 45.1% • 3P 36.0% • FT 78.2%
    13.0PPG
  • 4
    Jamichael StillwellF • GP 30 • MIN 28.4FG 50.8% • 3P 31.6% • FT 72.4%
    11.7PPG
  • 5
    Chris JohnsonG • GP 31 • MIN 15.7FG 44.0% • 3P 36.9% • FT 70.0%
    6.4PPG
Rebounds leadersRPG
  • 1
    Jamichael StillwellF • GP 30 • MIN 28.4FG 50.8% • 3P 31.6% • FT 72.4%
    8.0RPG
  • 2
    John BolC • GP 32 • MIN 18.7FG 72.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 68.1%
    5.5RPG
  • 3
    Jordan BurksF • GP 32 • MIN 28.0FG 45.1% • 3P 36.0% • FT 78.2%
    4.8RPG
  • 4
    Devan CambridgeF • GP 32 • MIN 17.4FG 45.2% • 3P 25.9% • FT 70.5%
    3.5RPG
  • 5
    Riley KugelG • GP 30 • MIN 28.9FG 41.8% • 3P 39.2% • FT 77.1%
    3.1RPG
Assists leadersAPG
  • 1
    Themus FulksG • GP 32 • MIN 32.8FG 46.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 79.5%
    6.7APG
  • 2
    Riley KugelG • GP 30 • MIN 28.9FG 41.8% • 3P 39.2% • FT 77.1%
    2.5APG
  • 3
    Jamichael StillwellF • GP 30 • MIN 28.4FG 50.8% • 3P 31.6% • FT 72.4%
    2.2APG
  • 4
    Chris JohnsonG • GP 31 • MIN 15.7FG 44.0% • 3P 36.9% • FT 70.0%
    1.9APG
  • 5
    Devan CambridgeF • GP 32 • MIN 17.4FG 45.2% • 3P 25.9% • FT 70.5%
    0.8APG
Steals leadersSPG
  • 1
    Jamichael StillwellF • GP 30 • MIN 28.4FG 50.8% • 3P 31.6% • FT 72.4%
    1.1SPG
  • 2
    Jordan BurksF • GP 32 • MIN 28.0FG 45.1% • 3P 36.0% • FT 78.2%
    1.1SPG
  • 3
    Riley KugelG • GP 30 • MIN 28.9FG 41.8% • 3P 39.2% • FT 77.1%
    1.0SPG
  • 4
    Themus FulksG • GP 32 • MIN 32.8FG 46.5% • 3P 40.8% • FT 79.5%
    0.8SPG
  • 5
    Devan CambridgeF • GP 32 • MIN 17.4FG 45.2% • 3P 25.9% • FT 70.5%
    0.5SPG
Blocks leadersBPG
  • 1
    John BolC • GP 32 • MIN 18.7FG 72.7% • 3P 0.0% • FT 68.1%
    1.1BPG
  • 2
    Devan CambridgeF • GP 32 • MIN 17.4FG 45.2% • 3P 25.9% • FT 70.5%
    0.6BPG
  • 3
    Jordan BurksF • GP 32 • MIN 28.0FG 45.1% • 3P 36.0% • FT 78.2%
    0.5BPG
  • 4
    Riley KugelG • GP 30 • MIN 28.9FG 41.8% • 3P 39.2% • FT 77.1%
    0.2BPG
  • 5
    Jeremy FoumenaC • GP 26 • MIN 9.5FG 54.8% • 3P 0.0% • FT 50.0%
    0.2BPG

Injury Report

Check player availability and injury-related production impact before evaluating the final matchup edge.

UCLA

3 listed
  • Evan ManjikianF
    Out
    InjuryUndisclosed
  • Donovan DentG
    Game Time Decision
    InjuryCalf
    Player statsGP 33 • MIN 34.2
    PPG13.5#2
    RPG2.9#5
    APG7.6#1
    SPG1.6#1
    BPG0.3#4
  • Tyler BilodeauF
    Game Time Decision
    InjuryKnee
    Player statsGP 31 • MIN 30.2
    PPG17.6#1
    RPG5.6#2
    APG1.1#5
    SPG0.5#7
    BPG0.4#3

UCF

1 listed
  • Tanner JonesG
    Out
    InjuryUndisclosed